USPTO serial 79053612
POLYTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3696059Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with POLYTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura A. Genovese
Laura A. Genovese K & G Law LLC602 S. Bethlehem Pike Bldg BAmbler, PA 19002United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Adhesives for industrial purposes, namely, conductive adhesives, high temperature adhesives, optical adhesives and silicones ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific, industrial, electric, electronic, optic and optoelectronic apparatus and instruments, namely, [ lasers not for medical uses and parts thereof, laser apparatus for marking, material processing, laser diagnostic apparatus, apparatus for the measurement of optical radiation, optoelectronic measuring and evaluation apparatus, optoelectronic apparatus and instruments for sensory analysis, namely, radiometers, radiation analyzers, systems for illumination, comprising LED-lighting and fiber-optic illumination, stroboscopes, photometers, optoelectronic analysis apparatus, namely, equipment for image processing, ] optoelectric apparatus and instruments for analysis, namely, white light interferometers, [ confocal scanning microscopes,optical microscopes, Bragg-cells, acousto-optical modulators, ] [ defect detectors, ] analyzers for flatness, roughness, thickness and waviness, [ electro-optical modulators, optoelectronic apparatus and instruments for analysis, namely, equipment for image processing, ] optoelectric apparatus and instruments for analysis, namely, white light interferometers, [ confocal scanning microscopes, optical microscopes, Bragg-cells, acousto-optical modulators, defect detectors, ] analyzers for flatness, roughness, thickness and waviness; [ optic, optoelectronic and electronic test apparatus, namely, test apparatus for hard disc drives, four-point-probes, ellipsometers, for semiconductor technology, capacitance-voltage and current-voltage measurement systems, comprising mercury probe stations, ] and laser vibrometers; parts for the above listed goods, namely, [ power measuring instruments and energy measuring instruments, ] modulators, rotators, [ cameras, detector arrays and IR visual apparatus for laser diagnostic systems, namely, infrared viewers, beam profilers; radiometers, photometers, light measuring instruments, dosimeters, spectroradiometers, color-measuring instruments, VIS and IR cameras, solar simulators, power supplies, monochromators, spectrographs, black body radiators and collimators for the measurement of optical radiation; ] laser vibrometers, interferometers, laser velocimeters, [ IR cameras, temperature measuring instruments by fiber optics and sensors for measuring the field intensity of microwaves by fiber optics; ] spectrometers, [ photometers and spectrophotometers; photodetectors, IR detectors, detector array apparatus, stroboscopes, stricks of fibers and swan necks, ring lights by fiber optics, line lights and illuminating areas; beam waveguides, laser diode modules, transmitting-receiving components for beam waveguides, splicing apparatus for beam waveguides, data link systems by beam waveguides comprising camera link video interfaces and firewire interfaces; electronic control systems for lamps comprising power supplies; electronic image-analyzing systems comprising components for image detecting equipment, namely, analog cameras, digital cameras, lenses, ] computer software for detecting defects by noise analysis, computer software for visualization of vibrations, mode shape, displacement and surface typography, computer software for industrial vision applications, and computer software for chemical analysis; computer software for detecting of defects by noise analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [ Optoelectronic apparatus and instruments for medical purposes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ Cold light sources; illuminating systems, namely, fiber optic light assemblies, LED light assemblies and LED flashlights for illumination purposes, and lamps ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Technical consulting related to [ physics and physics research; ] engineering; computer software engineering, namely, computer software design ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Polytec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Polytec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Polytec GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POLYTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |