Drawing for KONDOR

USPTO serial 79053689

KONDOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734345Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KONDOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy C. Ziegler

Amy C. Ziegler Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.200 W. Madison St.Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for managing and conducting financial market transactionsACTIVE—
042Design and production of software for banking and financial risk management matters; computer engineering services for banking, monetary and financial risk management matters; renting, developing, building and updating software for banking and financial risk management matters; computer programming for banking, monetary and financial risk management matters; technical project studies, namely, industrial research in the field of financial softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Sep 24, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 28, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 3, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 15, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 14, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2016PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Aug 9, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 30, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2009CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 27, 2009RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance