USPTO serial 79053694
KAYRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAYRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN ST., 7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing in the nature of underwear and outerwear made from all kinds of materials, except protective materials, namely, trousers, jackets, overcoats, coats, blouses, skirts, suits, jerseys, waistcoats, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, dresses, bermuda shorts, shorts, pajamas, pullovers, jeans, tracksuits, rainwear, beachwear, bathing suits, swimming suits; underwear, namely, boxer shorts, brassieres, briefs, pants; clothing in the nature of gloves; footwear, namely, shoes, rain boots, ski boots, bath slippers, sandals, slippers, sports shoes, lace boots and parts thereof in the nature of shoe parts, namely, heelpieces, heels, insoles, footwear uppers; stockings, socks; headgear, namely caps, hats, berets, skull caps; clothing for children, namely, layettes, pyjamas for children, overalls for children, breeches for children, boots, shoes and slippers for children, babies' diapers of textile, baby bibs not of paper; belts; camisoles, sarongs, scarves, neck scarves, shawls, collars, mufflers, neckties, ties, suspenders, wristbands, pareos, bandanas | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail sale services, namely, the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a wide variety of goods enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from an Internet web site particularly specializing in the marketing of the sale of goods of others; Retail sale services, namely, the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a wide variety of goods enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods in the field of clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |