Drawing for X-MELT

USPTO serial 79053705

X-MELT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3673137Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2009
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-MELT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roxana A. Sullivan

ROXANA A. SULLIVAN DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATES, LLC.120 SOUTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1400CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Equipment for the steel plant industry, namely, [ smelters, ] converter systems, namely, converter machines, gas cleaning and gas-recovering systems, namely, gas cleaning and gas-recovering machines [, desulphurization systems, namely, desulphurization machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electrical and electronic instrumentation and electrical and electronic control devices for the steel plant industry, namely, [ for smelters, for electric submerged arc furnaces, ] for electric arc furnaces, for converter plants, for gas cleaning and gas-recovering plants [, for RH-degassing, for tank degassing, for ladle furnace, for desulphurization plants; weighing, measuring, signaling and checking apparatus and instruments, namely, ammeters, wattmeters, water analyzers, gas and air analyzers, automatic chemical analysis apparatus, speed measuring apparatus, pressure measuring apparatus and pressure measuring detectors, length measuring apparatus, metal hardness testing machines, tension testers, x-ray machines and apparatus, not for medical purposes, data processing equipment and computers; computer programs recorded on data media for controlling equipment for steel plant industry ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Furnaces for steel plants; cooling systems [ comprised of reservoirs, pumps, filters, cooling header, cooling bed, cool bed tables, cooling line, cooling tower, cooling pipe for steel plants, namely, for smelters, for electric submerged arc furnaces, ] for electric arc furnaces, for converter plants, for gas cleaning and gas recovering plants [, for RH-degassing, for tank degassing, for ladle furnace, for desulphurization plants ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Building and construction planning, services of an engineer; design and development of computer software; technical consultation relating to research and development of equipment for the steel plant industry, of control devices for the steel plant industry, of furnaces for steel plants; preparation of technical expert opinion relating to research and development of equipment for the steel plant industry, of control devices for the steel plant industry, of furnaces for steel plants ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 25, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 28, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 26, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 24, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 23, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 22, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 31, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 31, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance