USPTO serial 79053841
BIOMONITOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3746900Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2010
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOMONITOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda H. Wilcox
Amanda H. Wilcox Hahn Loeser & Parks LLPOne GOJO PlazaSuite 300AKRON, OH 44311-1076Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for use with medical patient monitoring of heart pacemakers for receiving, processing, transmitting, and displaying patient data; computer hardware and software for programming and monitoring of heart pacemakers; computer hardware and software for testing heart pacemakers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical and medical equipment and electromedical devices and parts thereof, namely, external and implantable heart pacemakers; Surgical and medical equipment, namely, defibrillators, cardioverters, electrodes; circulation support equipment and cardiological diagnostic and equipment, namely, heart monitors and medical apparatus for diagnosing suspected heart attacks, catheters, percutanueous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheters and medical guide wire; apparatus for use in the implantation of stents, namely, medical guidewire, stents and apparatus for use in balloon dilation, namely, coronary balloon dilation catheters; resuscitation equipment, namely, electrodes for use in delivering an electrical impulse for maintaining or restarting the heart; artificial organs, namely, artificial hearts and artificial endoprostheses; surgical implants comprising artificial material, namely, cardio-vascular implants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOTRONIK SE & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biotronik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biotronik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biotronik GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biotronik CRM Patent AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BIOMONITOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 25, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |