Drawing for VAN LEER

USPTO serial 79053957

VAN LEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAN LEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Packaging containers of metal, among which, containers, barrels, kegs and drums made of metal; parts for the aforesaid productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Packaging containers not of metal for example of plastics, among which, containers, barrels, kegs and drums; parts for the aforesaid productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance