USPTO serial 79053994
HIFUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HIFUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
London, GB
Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
London, GB
Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
London, GB
Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Tally Eitan
A. Tally Eitan Eitan Mehulal Sadot6480 Calverton Drive, Unit 202,c/o Edna EisemannFrederick, MD 20874Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Catalysts for chemical processes, namely, Catalysts, supported catalysts and pelleted catalysts for hydrogen generation, hydrogen purification and hydrogen after treatment; catalysts for chemical processes, namely, catalysts, supported catalysts and pelleted catalysts for use in fuel cells; chemical adsorbents and chemical absorbents for removal of contaminants from a gas stream [ ; chemicals for industrial purposes, namely, chemical products for hydrogen storage, namely, carbon, zeolites, simple metal hydrides, complex metal hydrides and chemical hydrides ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Fuel cells ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Matthey
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HIFUEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 18, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |