Drawing for TOUR MAX

USPTO serial 79054004

TOUR MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOUR MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

Thomas J. Moore BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 Slaters Lane, Fourth floorAlexandria, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007vehicle parts, namely, engine cases, cam covers, intake manifolds, power valves for carburetors, oil tanks, rocker arms, and push rods; ignition coils for motorcycles; muffler connecting gaskets for motorcycles; engine valve shims for motorcycles; repair parts for carburetors of motorcycles namely, jets, floats, valves, diaphragms, filters, nuts, bolts and carburetors; carburetor holders for motorcycles also known as carb holders; fuel petcocks for motorcyclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012land vehicle parts, namely, axles, wheels, fenders, windshields, clutch linings, clutch mechanisms for motor cars, electric drives for vehicles, motors; parts for motorcycles, namely, handle bars, shift levers, front forks joints; fork bearings, fork races, fork seals for motorcycles; clutch linings, clutch mechanisms, namely clutches, electric drives, motors; transmissions for land vehicles; land vehicle parts, namely axles; wheel bearings for land vehicles; brake rotors for land vehicles; brakes for vehicles; brake drums, brake disks, brake cylinders, brake shoes for land vehicles; drive chains for motorcycles, engine timing components, namely, cam chains for motorcycles; repair parts for master brake cylinders for motorcycles, namely, nuts, bolts and brake cylinders; repair parts for brake calipers for motorcycles, namely, nuts, bolts and calipers; clutch discs and plates for motorcycles; clutch springs for motorcycles; repair parts for clutch slave cylinders for motorcycles namely, nuts, bolts and cylinders; bearings for wheels for land vehicles, steering parts for land vehicles, namely steering and swing arms for motorcycles; regulator rectifiers for motorcycles; starter relays for motorcycles; carbon brushes for motorcycles; cdi for motorcycles; repair parts for front forks of motorcycles, namely, front forks joints, fork bearings, fork races, and fork seals; steering oil handle bar dampers and their brackets for motorcycles; automotive parts, namely engine oil seals for motorcycles; brake discs for motorcyclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 30, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 28, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2009GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 12, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 15, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance