Drawing for MEDCERT

USPTO serial 79054041

MEDCERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3686187Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 22, 2009
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDCERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan M. Shortell

Brendan M. Shortell Lambert Shortell & Connaughton92 State StreetSuite 200Boston, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Services of a technical test and measurement laboratory in the field of medical devices; examination of medical devices for purposes of certification; examination of quality management systems in health care for purposes of certificationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 25, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 14, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 6, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance