USPTO serial 79054189
PEIKKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3673141Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PEIKKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S. Fruchter
Lynn S. Fruchter Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47 Street, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Concrete reinforcing materials of steel for building purpose; metal concrete construction hardware of steel, namely, load transfer dowels; [ metal clamps for wood; ] metal fasteners, namely, [ nails and ] screws; clad steel plates; [ load-bearing steel beams; ] pre-fabricated load-bearing steel architectural columns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peikko Group Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Peikko Finland Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Peikko Finland Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Peikko Finland Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named PEIKKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 25, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |