USPTO serial 79054306
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers (not of precious metal nor coated therewith); combs and sponges; brushes (except paint brushes); brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes; steelwool; unworked or semiworked glass (except glass used in buildings); glassware, porcelain and earthenware (included in this class) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |