Drawing for BIOSAFE

USPTO serial 79054308

BIOSAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOSAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic products, non-medical preparations for skin care, cleansing and improvement, creams, lotions, balms, gels, fluids, powder and serums; non-medical preparations for hair care, cleaning and improvement, lotions, shampoos, creams, gels, foams and balms; all these goods are produced by organic farming or made from goods produced by organic farmingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 12, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 7, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 25, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 25, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 1, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 1, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance