Drawing for HYBRID POWER

USPTO serial 79054370

HYBRID POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYBRID POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motor-driven agricultural implements and garden tools; garden machines; mechanical soil and lawn cultivating implements as well as implements for cultivation and care of plants, particularly motor-driven shears, trimmers, mowers as reel, electro, battery and petrol mowers, scarifiers, motor-driven saws and cutting apparatus, as well as shredders and presses, motor-driven implements for cleaning and cultivating; spare parts, fittings and accessories for all mentioned goods (included in this class)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 8, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 19, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 12, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 8, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 8, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 3, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance