USPTO serial 79054543
ARTEMIS OF SWITZERLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3828404Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2010
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTEMIS OF SWITZERLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics for high-quality care for women; all the aforesaid goods are of Swiss origin | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis Suisse SA
- Other trademarks owned by intracosmed AG
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis Suisse SA
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis Suisse SA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ARTEMIS OF SWITZERLAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 25, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |