Drawing for CATIFA

USPTO serial 79054607

CATIFA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3639737Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 16, 2009
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CATIFA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture [, mirrors, and picture frames ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 20, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 25, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 17, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 10, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 6, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 6, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance