USPTO serial 79054670
PCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3725664Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 15, 2009
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
86159 Augsburg, DE
86159 AUGSBURG, DE
86159 AUGSBURG, DE
86159 AUGSBURG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph G. Curatolo
JOSEPH G. CURATOLO CURATOLO SIDOTI CO., LPA24500 CENTER RIDGE ROADSUITE 280CLEVELAND, OH 44145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical products for use in the building sector, namely, adhesives for floor coverings; dust-proofing chemicals for use in coating and sealing, and impregnating water-repellent chemical preservatives for concrete, coatings, stones and walls; adhesive materials for building, namely, construction glues for tile flooring; synthetic resins for gravel consolidation; construction adhesives for surface leveling and for plaster supports | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | sealing and insulating products for the building sector, namely, adhesive sealants, caulking compounds and dust-proofing sealants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | laying and jointing mortar, particularly for tiles; cementitious material for surface leveling | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PCI Augsburg GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by PCI AUGSBURG GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by PCI AUGSBURG GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by PCI AUGSBURG GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PCI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |