Drawing for BIG MAX

USPTO serial 79054673

BIG MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Isabella Hoedl

27 GlacisstrasseGraz, 8010AUSTRIA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Forks for maintaining putting greensSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Towels for wiping golf clubsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Headgear, namely peaked caps and sun visors for men and childrenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Golf gloves, devices for retrieving golf balls, plastic tees, wooden tees, scorecard holders, travel covers for golf bags, protective covers for golf clubs, apparatus for retrieving golf balls, golf club grips, golf club shafts, golf clubs, golf balls, golf bags, poles for retrieving ballsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 12, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance