USPTO serial 79054788
CCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3831973Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Stone
Mark P. Stone Mark P. Stone, Attorney at Law50 BroadwayHawthorne, NY 10532UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Organizing, conducting and arranging of educational congresses, conferences, colloquiums, symposiums, seminars and workshops; publication of texts, other than advertising texts; instruction and further training and distribution of instructional materials in connection therewith; all of the aforesaid services in the field of lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire chains and tire traction devices, and for engineering and business economics in this field | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technology supervision and inspection in the field of designing, operating and improving conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire chains and tire traction devices; consulting services in the field of engineering, planning and design services related to conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire chains and tire traction devices; industrial design services; design of mechanical components; providing information in the field of designing, operating and improving conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire chains and tire traction devices; engineering services, particularly technical project planning and design engineering of conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire chains and tire traction devices; computer software design; technical, physics and engineering services, namely, technical and physical engineering; technical analysis of conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire protection chains and tire traction devices, and of processes for manufacturing, distributing and selling conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, tire chains and tire traction devices for the purpose of evaluating, designing and improving the aforementioned devices and processes; surveying; material testing; research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of hoisting, sling, load lifting and lashing devices, conveying installations, tire protection and chains; mechanical research; construction drafting; all of the aforesaid services in the field of conveying, hoisting, lifting, lashing and sling devices, and in the field of tire chains and tire traction devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger; & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | FINA | FINAL DISPOSITION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |