USPTO serial 79054866
GLOGSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2010
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOGSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
CZ
Other trademarks owned by WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
CZ
Other trademarks owned by WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
CZ
Other trademarks owned by WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boris Umansky
Boris Umansky Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan Ave.Suite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ Advertising and publicity, promotion and marketing services for others in the form of providing information and multimedia content, namely, prerecorded DVDs, CDs, photos, videos and audio content and user generated multimedia content over the Internet and other communications networks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ broadcasting and webcasting services, namely, uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing, and otherwise providing access to and transmission of electronic media, multimedia content and information over the internet and other communications networks; providing access to an online computer data base featuring video and audio content and user generated multimedia content; providing online forums and online chat rooms for transmission of messages among users concerning collegiate life, general interest, virtual community, photo and video sharing; providing access to a global computer network, namely, access to blogs, broadcasting of audio and video programmes over a global computer network ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | educational and entertainment services provided via the internet and other computer and communications networks, namely, providing an internet website featuring, user-generated photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring information on art, music, pop culture, education, entertainment, sports, and personal relationship advice for entertainment purpose only; on-line computer games, multimedia publishing of electronic publications, namely, online electronic publishing of text and graphic works of others featuring user-generated photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring information on art, music, pop culture, education, entertainment, sports, and personal relationship advice for entertainment purpose only; on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring user-generated photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring information on art, music, pop culture, education, entertainment, sports, and personal relationship advice for entertainment purpose only | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Computer and Internet-related expert technical services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the user to publish and share their own content and images on-line; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others that provide access to non-downloadable software to enable sharing of multimedia content and comments among users and provide uploading, downloading, capturing, showing, editing, playing, streaming, viewing, tagging, blogging, sharing, manipulating, distributing, publishing and reproducing electronic media, information and multimedia content via the Internet and other computer and communications network, namely, videos, pictures, text, games, user-generated content in the form of sharing of multimedia content via the Internet and other computer and communications networks; Hosting of digital content on the Internet, namely, multimedia digital content for others ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by WDF - Web Design Factory, spol s r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by Glogster, a.s.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GLOGSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |