USPTO serial 79054925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely body and beauty care preparations, lotions, creams and gels for the cleaning of the skin, eau-de-Cologne, perfumes, creams for cosmetic use for skin care, cosmetic milks, oils and creams for face care, cosmetic preparations for regenerating the skin, cosmetic preparations for lip care, cosmetic preparations for eyelashes and for eye contours | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |