USPTO serial 79054926
ENLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metallic joiners, fasteners and connectors; metallic joiners, fasteners and connectors for coupling modular building elements together; predominantly metallic joining, fastening and connector systems for use in construction, including the construction of, inter alia, woodwork, posts, beams, bars, dividers, panels, frames including frames for doors, mirrors and windows, ceilings, hand rails, cornices, arches, casings, facades, building interiors, winter gardens, garden houses, building elements, machines and vehicles; expandable metallic joiners, fasteners and connectors; metallic dovetail joiners, fasteners and connectors; predominantly metallic module connector systems including window module connector systems; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods including hinges and expandable connectors; metallic building materials including window frame assemblies and window frames, the foregoing excluding all forms of flooring | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials including window frame assemblies and window frames, the foregoing excluding all forms of flooring | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Non-metallic joiners, fasteners and connectors; non-metallic joiners, fasteners and connectors for coupling modular building elements together; predominantly non-metallic joining, fastening and connector systems for use in construction, including the construction of, inter alia, woodwork, posts, beams, bars, dividers, panels, frames including frames for doors, mirrors and windows, ceilings, hand rails, cornices, arches, casings, facades, building interiors, winter gardens, garden houses, building elements, machines and vehicles; expandable non-metallic, including plastic, joiners, fasteners and connectors; non-metallic, including plastic, dovetail joiners, fasteners and connectors; predominantly non-metallic module connector systems including window module connector systems; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods including hinges and expandable connectors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |