USPTO serial 79054968
ZLK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3564945Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2009
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZLK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine parts, namely, bearings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 17, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |