USPTO serial 79055010
I-SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3752386Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT R. FOSTER
SCOTT R. FOSTER PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO, P.C.470 TOTTEN POND ROADWALTHAM, MA 02451-1914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine coupling and transmission components for connecting motors for machines having spindles adapted to receive tools for engagement with workpieces, to hydraulically and pneumatically operated clutches and brakes of those machines, and not for land vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |