Drawing for TAURULIFT

USPTO serial 79055042

TAURULIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAURULIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla

Charles P. LaPolla OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicles, machine coupling and transmission components, namely, transmission belts for land vehicles, transmission cases for land vehicles, change gear cases in the nature of gear boxes for land vehicles, and other parts, components and spare parts for land vehicles, namely, transmissions, structural parts for land vehicles, tire snow chains, tire chains, wheels, windshields, differentials, fender flares, drive belts, drive gears, fenders, mud guards, running boards, axles, suspension struts, ball joints, idler arms, sun visors, windshield visors, rearview mirrors, shock absorbers, steering wheels, windshield wipers, lug nuts for vehicle wheelsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 29, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance