USPTO serial 79055171
NEW <ID COSMETICS LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW <ID COSMETICS LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chorleywood, Herts, GB
Chorleywood, Herts, GB
Chorleywood, Herts WD3 5SN, GB
Chorleywood, Herts WD3 5SN, GB
Chorleywood, Herts WD3 5SN, GB
Chorleywood, Herts WD3 5SN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robin E. Silverman
Robin E. Silverman GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE711 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic skin creams; cosmetic preparations for skin care; [ deodorants for personal use; ] eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow pencils; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; false eyelashes; [ false nails; perfumes in the nature of extracts of flowers; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; ] lipsticks; lotions for cosmetic purposes; [ tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; ] make-up; make-up powder; make-up preparations; make-up removing preparations; mascara; [ beauty masks; ] cleansing milk for toiletry purposes; [ nail care preparations; ] nail polish; nail varnish; [ nail varnish removing preparations; ] cosmetic pencils [ ; cotton swabs for toiletry purposes; non-medicated toiletries; depilatory wax ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clive Colman
- Other trademarks owned by Kelly Colman
- Other trademarks owned by Clive Colman
- Other trademarks owned by Clive Colman
- Other trademarks owned by Kelly Colman
- Other trademarks owned by Kelly Colman
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named NEW <ID COSMETICS LONDON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |