USPTO serial 79055231
HTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing advertising services by means of television for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcast and Television Services, namely, providing cable television broadcasting, radio broadcasting, music broadcasting, namely, providing access to digital music websites on the Internet; video broadcasting, television broadcasting, broadcast of cable television programmes, broadcast of information by radio, satellite and television; broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and videos provided via a video-on-demand service; transmission of cable television, transmission of television programmes by satellite, transmission of video films over digital network; broadcast of radio programmes, broadcast of information by means of television, broadcast of television programmes, broadcast of cable television | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAI TRUYEN HINH THANH PHO HO CHI MINH (HOCHIMINH CITY TELEVISION)
- Other trademarks owned by DAI TRUYEN HINH THANH; PHO HO CHI MINH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named HTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |