USPTO serial 79055261
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Lamps for medical purposes, lamps for operating tables, lamps for physiotherapy, lamps with continuous visible light for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric lamps for streetlights, science, commercial lighting, automobiles, ships, buildings, air planes and other architectural uses; sun lamps, tanning lamps, infrared lamps, electric lamps with continuous visible light; light emitting diode lamp; lamp bulbs; pin socket light emitting diode lamp, lamp fixture and light emitting diode lighting fixture for use in display, commercial, industrial, residential and architectural accent lighting applications, light emitting diode light assemblies for street lights, science, commercial lighting, automobiles, ships, buildings, air planes and other architectural uses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |