Drawing for Q-LIGHT

USPTO serial 79055261

Q-LIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Q-LIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Lamps for medical purposes, lamps for operating tables, lamps for physiotherapy, lamps with continuous visible light for medical purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Electric lamps for streetlights, science, commercial lighting, automobiles, ships, buildings, air planes and other architectural uses; sun lamps, tanning lamps, infrared lamps, electric lamps with continuous visible light; light emitting diode lamp; lamp bulbs; pin socket light emitting diode lamp, lamp fixture and light emitting diode lighting fixture for use in display, commercial, industrial, residential and architectural accent lighting applications, light emitting diode light assemblies for street lights, science, commercial lighting, automobiles, ships, buildings, air planes and other architectural usesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 2, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 2, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 29, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 24, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance