USPTO serial 79055379
STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard, paper for packaging, wrapping paper, bags of paper for wrapping, boxes of cardboard or paper, bags of paper or plastics for packaging, envelopes and pouches of paper or plastics for packaging, paper ribbons, ribbons of paper for wrapping, paper bows, adhesives for stationery or household purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Elastic ribbons, ribbons of textile materials, ribbons of textile for packaging and for wrapping, bows of textile for decoration, artificial flowers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |