Drawing for OPULENCE

USPTO serial 79055384

OPULENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPULENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications and telephonic apparatus and instruments; radio telephones; mobile telephones; tokens for activating telecommunications apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Telephone answering and message handling servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
036Insurance and financing of telecommunications apparatus and systems; leasing of apparatus, instruments, installations or components for use in the provision of telecommunication servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of telecommunications apparatus and systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunication services; telephone message collection and transmission services; radio paging and telecommunication mail services; transmission, receipt, storage and processing of telecommunication messages; satellite telecommunication services; hire or rental of apparatus, instruments, installations or components for use in the provision of the aforesaid services; advisory information and consultancy services relating to the aforementioned servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 5, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 28, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance