USPTO serial 79055500
SHOP 24
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3838002Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 2010
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOP 24?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
US
NL
NZ
NZ
NZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for controlling and operating vending machines; computer hardware for use with vending machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, business management, business administration, and providing office functions, all of the aforementioned services in the field of franchising | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; providing temporary accommodation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHOP 24 GLOBAL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SHOP24 HOLDING B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by VTL GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VTL GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VTL GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named SHOP 24
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |