Drawing for OHR

USPTO serial 79055558

OHR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3676595Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2009
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OHR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Scott Alprin

M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Chemical processing machines, namely, liquid-liquid mixers and reaction accelerating machines, gas-liquid contact and reaction machines, emulsifying machines and pH controlling or neutralizing machines; food and beverage processing machines, namely, liquid-liquid mixers and reaction accelerating machines, and gas-liquid contact and reaction machinesACTIVE—
011Air diffuser for sewage and drainage water installations; waste water and drainage water processing apparatus, namely, waste water purification apparatus and installations; aerators as material component parts of waste water processing installations; harmful components decomposing apparatus and installations, namely, apparatus and installations for decomposing toxic substances in water by making ozone gas micro bubblesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 27, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 25, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 25, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 7, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance