USPTO serial 79055666
CHARMILLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARMILLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewellery, precious stones, all the aforesaid products of Swiss origin; horological and chronometric instruments, namely clocks, watches, table clocks, chronometers from Geneva | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |