Drawing for PALACE

USPTO serial 79055716

PALACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PALACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Watches, wristwatches, mechanical watches, chronographs for use as timepieces; chronometers; hands for clock and watch-making; cases for watches; dials for clocks and watches; watchstraps; watch springs; movements for clocks and watches; barrels for the manufacture of clocks and watches; watch chains; watch crystals; watch presentation casesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 12, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance