USPTO serial 79055889
STERLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STERLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
William J. Seiter Seiter & Co.220 26th Street, Suite 202Santa Monica, CA 90402UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 31, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |