Drawing for CONCENTRIX SOLAR

USPTO serial 79055900

CONCENTRIX SOLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3654921Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 14, 2009
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCENTRIX SOLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. W. Wong

David A. W. Wong BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric solar cellsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
040[ Production of solar power ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042[ Design of photo-voltaic modules and systems and photo-voltaic power plants ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 14, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 14, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 14, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 3, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 3, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 1, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 1, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 1, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 1, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 14, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 10, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Mar 10, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 14, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Apr 22, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 14, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 7, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance