Drawing for VARIOPLANT

USPTO serial 79055973

VARIOPLANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3746913Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 9, 2010
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARIOPLANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Turbines for power stations, namely, steam, gas and hydraulic turbines for power generation and parts thereof, electric generators for power generationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Control centers for power stations comprised of computer hardware and computer software for controlling power station operationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Steam generators for power stationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 16, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 20, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 20, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 14, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance