USPTO serial 79055988
SELA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3673155Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SELA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewellery, precious stones, cuff links; earrings; ornamental pins; tie clips; tie pins | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Backpacks; bags for campers; beach bags; briefcases; chain mesh purses, not of precious metal; clothing for pets; garment bags for travel; handbags; haversacks; imitation leather; leather straps; net bags for shopping; parasols; purses, not of precious metal; purses; school bags; sling bags for carrying infants; traveling bags; traveling trunks; umbrellas; valises; wheeled shopping bags | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SELA EUROPE DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SELA EUROPE DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SELA EUROPE DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named SELA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |