USPTO serial 79056207
IPP-ON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3576532Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IPP-ON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman F. Hainer Jr.
Norman F. Hainer Jr. Smith & Nephew, Inc.1450 Brooks RoadMemphis, TN 38116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical implants comprising artificial material for immobilising the proximal interphalangeal joint of the foot; surgical equipment for orthopaedic, osteosynthetic and traumatological applications, namely, artificial surgical implants for the traumatological and orthopaedic osteosynthesis of limbs and the trunks; joint protheses; goods of metal for medical use, namely, surgical screws, surgical pins; arthrodesis nails, and bolts; ancillary equipment, namely, needle positioning guides; surgical instruments, namely, impactors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEWDEAL
- Other trademarks owned by NEWDEAL
- Other trademarks owned by NEWDEAL
- Other trademarks owned by Smith & Nephew, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NEWDEAL
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named IPP-ON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |