Drawing for VIVIL

USPTO serial 79056280

VIVIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3643766Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 23, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIVIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanjiv Sarwate

HARMSEN & UTESCHER RECHTSANWÄLTE PATENTANWÄLTEALTER WALL 5520457 HAMBURG,GERMANY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sugar confectionery for pharmaceutical use, namely, medicated confectionery; chewing gums for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Confectionery made of sugar and sugar substitutes, namely, candies, compressed candies, chewing candies with liquid fillings, non-medicated peppermint lozenges and peppermint candies; chocolate, chocolate truffles filled with liquids, namely, with wines and spirits; chewing gumsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Sep 28, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 5, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 29, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 29, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 29, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 3, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 25, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 25, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 14, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance