USPTO serial 79056335
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
B-8550 ZWEVEGEM, BE
B-8550 ZWEVEGEM, BE
ZWEVEGEM, BE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER FRESH IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DR., SUITE 2000RESTON, VA 20190United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Fibres of stainless steel or other common metals; metal plates and cloths made from metal fibres by any possible process, such as weaving, knitting, and sintering; plates and cloths made from metal fibers used for filtration, heating, drying and burning installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Filtration, heating, drying and burning installations, namely, sintered metal fibre filtration installations for petro-chemical, hydraulic, cutting fluid, coalescing, demisting, and gas filtration applications, gas filtration installations for chemical production, natural gas production, coal gasification, gas to liquid processing, production of aluminum, fine powder processing applications, and polymer filtration installations for bottle grade polymer production, packaged film production, specialty polymers, high viscuous petro-chemical and synthetic non-woven applications; burners, namely, gas burners; gas burners for gas installations for domestic use; gas burners designed to operate in high efficiency/condensing boiler appliances; gas burners for furnace boilers for domestic use; gas burners for heating installations for domestic use; gas burning infra-red drying installations, namely, gas fired infra-red emitters in the nature of infrared lamps used in industrial drying units; metal plates and cloths made from metal fibres sold as parts of sintered metal fibre filtration installations for petro-chemical, hydraulic, cutting fluid, coalescing, demisting, and gas filtration applications, gas filtration installations for chemical production, natural gas production, coal gasification, gas to liquid processing, production of aluminum, fine powder processing applications, and polymer filtration installations for bottle grade polymer production, packaged film production, specialty polymers, high viscuous petro-chemical and synthetic non-woven applications ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |