USPTO serial 79056340
PLD PRINTING-LIKE DISPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807107Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLD PRINTING-LIKE DISPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
advanced display technology AG
CH-9050 Appenzell, CH
advanced display technology AG
CH-9050 Appenzell, CH
advanced display technology AG
CH-9050 Appenzell, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
Frederick W. Meyers Ladas & Parry LLP224 South MichiganSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical apparatus utilizing non-LED electrowetting technology, namely, phones, mobile phones, PDAs, MP3 players, personal computers, televisions, video screens, electronic notice boards; optical components utilizing non-LED electrowetting technology, namely, plasma display panels, flat panel display screens, cables for optical signal transmission, electronic indicator boards, backlit signs, digital signage monitors; optical shutters and optical reflectors utilizing non-LED electrowetting technology; electronic apparatus, namely, mobile phones with cameras; electronic visual displays utilizing non-LED electrowetting technology, namely, LCD projectors used to display advertisements, all for use on or in connection with electronic apparatus, hand-held electronic apparatus, personal digital assistants (PDAs), electronic navigation apparatus, data processing apparatus, telecommunications devices including mobile telephones, electronic media players including MP3 players and MPEG players, portable media players, electronic media recorders including MP3 recorders and MPEG recorders, optical media players including CD, DVD, and HD-DVD players, optical media recorders including CD, DVD, and HD-DVD recorders and electronic apparatus for vehicles including automobiles; electronic apparatus utilizing non-LED electrowetting technology, namely, notice boards, video screens, television video screens, computer monitors, hand held electrowetting displays, flat panel display screens, signaling lights for use as traffic-lights | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Electronic clocks; electronic watches; parts and fittings for clocks and watches | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Posters for advertising | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by advanced display technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by advanced display technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by advanced display technology AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PLD PRINTING-LIKE DISPLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |