USPTO serial 79056469
KAPAZA!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAPAZA!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Purchasing services for manufacturers and suppliers; on-line auctions and mail order services office functions through on-line catalogues by means of a global computer network; commercial business management; consultancy and assistance in the field of business management and business organization services; e-commerce services, namely retailing by electronic means; advertisement brokerage services; retail services in the field of second hand goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication, especially through a global telecommunications network for the benefit of manufacturers, suppliers and retailers; network teleconferencing services, namely providing access to an on-line network of suppliers, manufacturers and retailers; consultancy in the field of telecommunication; providing access time to computer databases; rental of access time to computers and computer databases | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Maintenance and design of websites; technical advice with respect to the use of websites on electronic networks, such as Internet; software development and graphic design for Internet applications; programming for electronic data processing; computer programming; web hosting; software development; software updating; consultancy in the field of computers; rental of computer software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kapaza! B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Kapaza! Holding BV
- Other trademarks owned by Marktplaats B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Kapaza! Belgium N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KAPAZA!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |