Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79056476?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79056476. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COMMON GROUND?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79056476, the listed owner(s) include: Common Ground Publishing, LLC, Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd, Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd, Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd.

What is USPTO serial number 79056476?

Serial number 79056476 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COMMON GROUND. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover COMMON GROUND?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: COMMON GROUND Serial# 79056476 | status 404; last event DENC | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of COMMON GROUND?

COMMON GROUND (79056476) currently shows USPTO status code 404 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMON GROUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Conference services in the field of "improving local and international knowledge base on issues of global concerns by building new kinds of knowledge communities that cut horizontally across legacy knowledge structures characterized by vertical separations-of discipline, professional association, institution and country, innovative in their messages and their media" namely, arranging and conducting of international conferences on selected topics involving a wide range of local and international educational institutions (academics) and community leaders, organizing topics, speakers and presentations on selected topics; services in relation to conference management systems, namely, receiving and handling proposals, registrations and programs-and also for publishing conference presentation content; organizing ways for talking and discussion of conference topics, namely, plenary session presentations by some of the world's leading thinkers followed by 'garden conversation' sessions, thirty-minute paper sessions which provide participants the opportunity to make a formal fifteen-minute presentation on their intellectual work, be that research, theory, practice or aesthetic work, followed by fifteen minutes of audience interaction, sixty-minute workshop sessions which involve extensive interaction between a presenter and participants around an idea or hands-on experience of a practice, and ninety-minute colloquium sessions which consist of five or more short presentations with audience interaction; services in relation to arranging virtual participation of conferences so that conferences do not exclude people who cannot afford to travel or who are unable to travel at the time of the conference; providing formal knowledge-making processes, namely, formalizing a journal process taking into account of presentation proposal to presentation and audience feedback to submission and peer refereeing; services in relation to academic knowledge creation and scholarly publication, namely, arranging peer review performed on a merit-based 'double-blind' peer review process, editing, developing a low-cost commercial approach to academic publishing; on-line publication of journals and books, every article having its own page and every author has their own self-maintainable website, which includes any articles and books, a blog, and places to paste their bionote, photo and CV; services in relation to publishing workflow engine, namely, providing proprietary publishing workflow engine which allows publishers to design and manage publishing processes, including peer review; services in relation to developing, comparing and publishing formal knowledge systems as Semantic Web ontologies, and software integration; services in relation to providing online authoring and word processing tools focusing on key functions of knowledge research and academic publishing, namely, citation management and type setting, peer-to-peer collaboration and variable outputs for web, print and word processing environments; online production and distribution of knowledge, namely, so that academic publishing gains the immediacy, speed and accessibility of the web while maintaining the intellectual standards of legacy peer refereed journals; services in relation to development of agenda, creating cutting edge 'social web' technologies and exploring new relationships of knowledge validation	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 9, 2018	DENC	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED	—
Feb 9, 2018	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Jul 7, 2017	INNT	TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB	—
Jun 13, 2017	INTS	TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB	—
Jun 13, 2017	INPC	INVALIDATION PROCESSED	—
May 23, 2017	INTR	TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED	—
Nov 3, 2016	CHLD	CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB	—
Sep 23, 2016	C71T	CANCELLED SECTION 71	—
Feb 5, 2013	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jun 10, 2010	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Jun 10, 2010	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
May 16, 2010	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Feb 16, 2010	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 5, 2010	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jan 21, 2010	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Jan 21, 2010	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Dec 1, 2009	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2009	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Oct 27, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Oct 27, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 7, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Sep 14, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 14, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 14, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2009	LIMG	LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB	—
Mar 16, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 20, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 20, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2008	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Sep 3, 2008	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Sep 3, 2008	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
Aug 30, 2008	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Aug 29, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 22, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Aug 21, 2008	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

COMMON GROUND