USPTO serial 79056497
GRIFFIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3647786Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIFFIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Textile machines, namely, textile scutching machines, rotary presses for textile machines, and printing machines for textile; tricot machines, namely, automatic looms, power looms, power weaving looms, and hosiery looms; warp preparation machines for knitting and weaving, namely, warp knitting machines, electric motor drives as parts of warp knitting machines, and warp knitting machines for preparation of lace; warping machines, namely, warp knitting machines for producing lace and yarn warping machines; direct beamers, namely, threading machines and yarn warping machines; Raschel machines; warp sampling machines, namely, yarn warping machines, yarn drawing machines, yarn tension stabilizers, web unwinding machines, and rotary transfer machines; beaming machines, namely, threading machines and yarn warping machines; sizing machines; dyeing units, namely, dyeing machines; stitch-bonding machines; bobbin lace machines, namely, weaving looms for bobbin lace; all the above for use in the textile industry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named GRIFFIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |