Drawing for MILLENARY

USPTO serial 79056503

MILLENARY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3661071Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 28, 2009
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENARY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN P. MURTAUGH

JOHN P. MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 EAST 9TH STREET, SUITE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014[ Precious metals and their alloys and objects made of precious metals, their alloys, or coated therewith, namely, tie pins, cuff links, pendants; jewellery; precious and semi-precious stones; ] timepieces, namely, watches, wrist-watches, component parts for timepieces, [ wall clocks, pendulettes in the nature of pendulum clocks, alarm clocks and other chronometric instruments; chronometers; ] chronographs; watch bands, dials [, cases, housings; presentation cases for timepieces and jewellery ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 27, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 28, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 3, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Apr 22, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 5, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance