USPTO serial 79056592
DELICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3631688Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2009
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DELICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-3336 LE ZWIJNDRECHT, NL
Sime Darby Oils Zwijndrecht Refinery B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Sime Darby Oils Zwijndrecht Refinery B.V.
NL
NL-3336 LE ZWIJNDRECHT, NL
NL-3336 LE ZWIJNDRECHT, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Cerrati
Michael C. Cerrati Belzer PC2905 Bull StreetSavannah, GA 31405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Margarine and other edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Unimills B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sime Darby Oils Zwijndrecht Refinery B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by SD Guthrie International
- Other trademarks owned by Unimills B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Unimills B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DELICO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |