Drawing for PURICLEAN

USPTO serial 79056603

PURICLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3666919Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 11, 2009
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURICLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert

Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, PO Box 224Bradford Green, Building 5Monroe, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of flavors in the flavouring industry; antibacterial and disinfecting non-nutritional food additives, for use as flavourings in oral care products, dentifrices and pharmaceutical productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
003Essential oils, dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005Oral care products, namely, mouth cavity cleansersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Food additives of natural and artificial origin, non-nutritional, other than essential oils, for use as flavourings to give taste to foodstuffs, confectionery products, chewing gum, beverages, pharmaceuticals, oral health products and dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2021INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 1, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 24, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 24, 2020C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 6, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 11, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 10, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 26, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2009CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 5, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2008RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance