Drawing for LA BASE

USPTO serial 79056704

LA BASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3705454Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 3, 2009
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA BASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Rodman Steele, Jr.

J. Rodman Steele, Jr. DUANE MORRIS LLP2700 North Military Trail, Suite 300Boca Raton, FL 33431-1808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Spoons; forks; non-electric cheese slicers; non-electric pizza cutters; dried bonito planes, namely, non electric planes for flaking dried bonito blocks; sugar tongs; non-electric can openers; nutcrackers not of precious metal; non-electric egg slicers; bladed or pointed hand tools, namely, cheese cutters, cheese slicers, non-electric fruit peelers, non-electric vegetable peelers, ice picks, chef knives, kitchen knives, butter knives, paring knives, desert knives, meat knives, steak knives, cake knives, table knives, vegetable slicersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Stainless steel cooking bowls; cooking vats; ice pails; whisks; household utensils, namely, strainers; pepper pots, sugar bowls and salt shakers not of precious metal; egg cups not of precious metal; napkin holders and napkin rings not of precious metal; trays not of precious metal; toothpick holders not of precious metal; colanders; shakers, namely, salt and pepper shakers; rice scoops; hand-operated coffee grinders and pepper mills; funnels; Japanese style wooden pestles; Japanese style earthenware mortars; Japanese style personal dining trays; bottle openers; household utensils, namely, radish graters; tart scoops; pan-mats, namely, drip mats for tea; chopsticks; chopstick cases; serving ladles and dippers; cooking sieves and sifters; cutting boards; rolling pins; cooking utensils, namely, grills; toothpicks; lemon squeezers; non-electric waffle irons; cleaning tools and washing utensils, namely, cleaning sponges, scrub sponge, scrub brushes, cleaning cloths; cooking pots and pans; non-electric coffee-pots not of precious metal; iron kettles; kettles; tableware not of precious metal, namely, serving forks, pasta serving forks, cooking forks and mixing spoons, serving spoons, slotted spoons, basting spoons, ice cream spoons; portable cold boxes; rice chests; food preserving jars of glass; drinking flasks; vacuum bottlesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 27, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 5, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 10, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 10, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 3, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 6, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 6, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 6, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 15, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 5, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance