Drawing for CAFIT

USPTO serial 79056735

CAFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3744827Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 2, 2010
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Dreitler

Joseph R. Dreitler DREITLER TRUE LLC19 E. Kossuth St.COLUMBUS, OH 43206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029milk-based beverages containing coffeeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030beverages, namely, coffee, artificial coffee, coffee extracts containing milk, fruit, flavorings, sweetening substances, fructose, glucose, caffeine, vitamins, or minerals; preparations for making non-alcoholic beverages, namely, mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 23, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 22, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 9, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 3, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 2, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2009CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 5, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance