USPTO serial 79056955
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tokyo 105-0004, JP
Tokyo 105-0004, JP
Tokyo 105-0004, JP
Koto-ku; Tokyo 135-8710, JP
Koto-ku; Tokyo 135-8710, JP
Koto-ku; Tokyo 135-8710, JP
Tokyo, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
Jeffrey H. Kaufman Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |