Drawing for CNP

USPTO serial 79056955

CNP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3639823Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 16, 2009
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CNP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

Jeffrey H. Kaufman Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Rolling mills; metalworking machines, namely, grinders ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Metal rolling; metalworking, namely, grinding and cuttingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 16, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 14, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 10, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2015C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 29, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2008CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 9, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance